Monday, December 30, 2019

Can Weapons Of Mass Destruction Be Justified - 1618 Words

Can Weapons of Mass Destruction be justified? Weapons of mass destruction are ‘weapons that can devastate large areas and kill huge numbers of people’. There are 3 types of WMD’s; Nuclear Weapons, Biological Weapons and Chemical Weapons. In the world there are only 8 counties that own nuclear weapons and these include USA, Russia, UK, China, France, India and Pakistan and unofficially Israel. In this essay I will be looking at whether or not Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD’s) can be justified, we can link this to the just war theory. I will also be looking at the 1945 Atomic bomb attack on Hiroshima and whether or not it can be justified. WMD’s can be justified WMD’s can be justified as they can stop a greater evil therefore meeting part of the criteria for a Just War. If they are stopping a greater evil then they can be seen as justifiable as destruction can possibly be reconciled quicker than a greater evil that could carry on for years. The possession of WMD’s themselves can be useful, the MAD theory (mutually assured destruction), if one country owns WMD’s then it’s unlikely another country is going to attack them, in the long run the possession of WMD’s could eradicate war, as there is a mutuality. Democratic countries can justify their WMD’s as they make their countries the ‘police’ of WMD’s and therefore shows their authority and power. Democratic countries that possess the nuclear weapons can make the world safer, again because of the MAD theory. CountriesShow MoreRelatedThe Iraq War Essay examples1281 Words   |  6 Pagespersuaded to support such a war. The Bush Administration has covered their schemes of war with lies to gain support. While weapons of mass destruction is supposedly the reason why the United States launched military action to begin with, all the clearly ignored consequences will haunt their final decision of war, and will remind them how the war is not and never was justified. Whither the war is for the protection of the United States and their alliances, or for oil production and the spread of democracyRead MoreOn August 6, 1945, The United States Of America Dropped1173 Words   |  5 Pages On August 6, 1945, the United State s of America dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. For decades, there have been feuds relating to the justification of the bombing. Was the U.S justified? It depends on your vantage point. The United States was justified due to the unprovoked attack and bombing of Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, which occurred three years prior to the bombing of Hiroshima, it was necessary to stop the war because it saved thousands of American lives. Until then, the fight had neverRead More The Effects of Reagan and Bush’s Policies in El Essay1696 Words   |  7 PagesSomoza dynasty in Nicaragua, the Reza Shahs in Iran, the dictator Franco in Spain, and the elite in El Salvador. Reagan’s belief that the Soviet Union was the Evil Empire committed him to support the brutal military regime in El Salvador, which he justified as protecting national security. Since September 11, the new American enemy is terrorism. To eliminate terrorist organizations, Bush has invaded Afghanistan and Iran. Bush has continued the precedent of ideology-induced foreign policy by justifyingRead MoreThe Bombing Of The Atomic Bomb956 Words   |  4 PagesI feel that violence and death resulting of innocent people is never justified. On the subject of the Atomic bomb the force which was used may have been very destructive but I suppose that the message the U.S was sending to Japan was clear and heard. American politicians believed that it was a necessary use of force. President Truman gave the Japanese a warning before hand saying that if they did not surrender more destruction would come their way. It was said in the book that the bomb was neededRead MoreShould We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb?1180 Words   |  5 Pagesdropped the atomic bomb? On August 6, 1945, the United States of America dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. For decades, there have been feuds relating to the justification of the bombing. Was the U.S justified? It depends on your vantage point. The United States was justified due to the unprovoked attack and bombing of Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, which occurred three years prior to the bombing of Hiroshima, it was necessary to stop the war because it saved thousands of American lives. UntilRead MoreShould The Us Dropped Atomic Bombs On Japan?1183 Words   |  5 Pageson Japan? By- Daniel Hernandez On August 6, 1945, the United States of America dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. For decades, there have been feuds relating to the justification of the bombing. Was the U.S justified? It depends on your opinion. The United States was justified due to the unprovoked attack and bombing of Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, which occurred three years prior to the bombing of Hiroshima, it was necessary to stop the war because it saved thousands of American lives. Until thenRead MoreEssay The Invasion of Iraq was Illegal1703 Words   |  7 Pagesneeded from the United Nations, therefore, the invasion of Iraq was illegal. It is true that Saddam Hussein was killing his own people, but the United States should not have invaded without solid proof. George W. Bush claimed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction but none were ever found. (The Invasion of Iraq is Illegal) In 1963, the CIA of the United States placed Husseins Ba’ath Party in power. We were complicit in the birth of this regime through an unconstitutional act of foreign aggressionRead MoreThe Taming Of General Macarthur1712 Words   |  7 Pagesand saving his city time and time again. What could happen when a person with great responsibilities begins disregarding them? Perhaps the most notorious civilian-military confrontation in the history of the United States could convey how such person can lose their authority and trustworthiness. President Harry S. Truman terminated General Douglas MacArthur from his position as the leader of the U.S. forces in Korea after General MacArthur escalated the conflict, going against the U.S. policy and ignitingRead More Use of the Atomic Bomb Against Japan was Justified Essay1137 Words   |  5 PagesAgainst Japan was Justified The use of the atomic bomb against Japan was completely justified in both cause and impact. An intense weapon was necessary to force a quick Japanese surrender. The bomb saved thousands upon thousands of American and Japanese lives that would have been lost if the war continued or an invasion occurred. The bomb was the only way to end the suffering of the millions who were being held captive by the Japanese oppressor. The weapon of mass destruction also sent a powerfulRead More Terrorism Essay1237 Words   |  5 PagesState of the Union address, President Bush threatened to expand the war on terrorism to countries that are developing weapons of mass destruction and nations that are â€Å"timid in the face of terror.† The president singled out three nations, North Korea, Iran, and Iraq as the â€Å"axis of evil† and that he might take military action to pre-empt the threat from their weapons of mass destruction. Although such rhetoric may simply be sabre rattling to intimidate those nations, the possibility of an expansion

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.